新西兰奥克兰assignment代写:第一修正案

2019-02-05 23:25

这个案例是对B部分的挑战，目的是为了获得前往机场参加迎新聚会的通道。它还对将B节作为一种手段来反对保障言论自由，包括结社自由和政治自由的《第一修正案》提出了挑战。马里兰州交通部拒绝了这群球迷在机场举行公众集会的请求。如果法院支持这一决定，它将以不同的方式影响当前的问题和商业法律。首先，第一修正案禁止美国政府和州政府通过施加限制来禁止集会和言论。在海牙诉首席信息官一案中，最高法院支持首席信息官集会的自由，支持其和平分发文献和组织劳工会议的意图，因此最高法院做出了有利于首席信息官的裁决，表明《城市条例》违反了第一修正案。只有当演讲或集会具有引人注目的利益，如对公众构成潜在危害时，政府才可以限制演讲或集会。B部分违反了这条法律，因为它禁止摇滚明星粉丝的公开集会以及他的公开演讲。在某些情况下，主要是在安全情况下，可能允许限制空间、时间和集会或讲话方式的规定。在大坏蛋布鲁斯的粉丝的案例中，B部分禁止公众聚集在机场的任何地方，显然违反了第一修正案。尽管机场不被认为是公共空间，但它们仍然是公众拥有的空间。由于本法的目的主要是为了净化机场，使活动和运营能够顺利进行，在不造成机场拥堵或干扰机场正常运营的情况下，球迷有权集会.
新西兰奥克兰assignment代写:第一修正案
This case is challenging Section B in order to obtain access to the airport for the welcome-home gathering. It is also challenging the use of Section B as a means of contradicting the first amendment that guarantees freedom of speech including freedom of association and political freedom. The State of Maryland’s Department of Transportation denied the groups of fans permission to have a public gathering at the airport. If the court upholds this decision, it is going to affect current issues and business laws in different ways. First of all, the first amendment prohibits the US government and the states government from forbidding assembly and speech by imposing putting restraints. In The Hague v. CIO case, the Supreme Court upheld the freedom to assemble by siding with the CIO with its intended activity of peaceably distributing literature and organizing labor meetings .The Supreme Court therefore ruled in the CIO favor showing that the city ordinance violated the First Amendment. The government may limit speech or assembly only when the speech or assembly has a compelling interest like presenting a potential harm to the general public . Section B tends to violate this law as it prohibits public gathering of the rock star fans as well as his intended public speech. A regulation that limits space, time and manner of assembly or speech may be allowed in some instances mostly in security instances. In the case of Big Bad Bruce’s fans, Section B clearly violated the First Amendment act by prohibiting public gathering anywhere in the airport. Even though airports are not considered public spaces, they are still spaces that the public own. Since the purpose of this law is mainly to decongest the airport and enable smooth running of activities and operations, the fans had the right to assemble as long as they did not cause congestion or interfere with smooth operations of the airport

• 上一篇：新西兰奥克兰代写作业:抗生素细菌
• 下一篇：新西兰奥克兰代写作业:视频点播行业