布里斯班代写assignment：创新经营

In relation to Charlie’s innovative operation, he needs to be advised that it is important to return to the three-part common law test for looking to determine as to whether the treatment administered to her was in her ‘best interests’[37] under the remit of Bolam Test[38]. Therefore, on the basis of the facts, it could be argued that the course of treatment prescribed by Mr Dire may not be the only viable alternative, as either a medical necessity or being in Charlie’s ‘best interests’[39] because Charlie has discovered over thirty surgeons disapprove of Mr Dire’s use of surgery. But it is also important to appreciate that in looking to determine as to whether this has any impact upon any remedy Charlie is ultimately awarded may depend upon how much weight is given to the opinions of the respective surgical opinions during legal proceedings.

Moreover, it is also important to appreciate that in relation to looking to determine as to whether Charlie is entitled to any remedy may also be affected by as to whether he was competent so as to consent to the operation, as we are not told that in the facts of this particular scenario or whether the surgery was in Charlie’s ‘best interests’[40]. But, on the other hand, it must also be recognised that experimentation in medicine, however ad hoc, is always done with a mixture of motives because, as well as the interests of their patients, doctors will also have an eye on the scientific value of their work so that incompetent subjects are usually the most vulnerable[41]. Therefore, with this in mind, it is perhaps hardly surprising that a combination of eager researchers and desperate relatives often obscure the fact the patient’s condition is best addressed with conservative therapy.