新西兰代写论文:洛克与霍布斯的观点

2018-10-09 13:30

洛克与霍布斯的观点不同。他认为人们可以生活在自然状态，即使没有合法建立的政府，生活也是可能的。对他来说，自然状态是“前政治，但非前道德”。此外，对他来说，这种自然状态是一种完全自由的状态，所有人都是平等的，只有“通过自然法则联系在一起”。他担心，对我们来说，一个拥有绝对权力的绝对君主，比自然状态下的生命更危险。这在洛克的思想中是积极的因为最好是生活在自然状态中你生活在完全的自由中没有个人权利和自由的限制。另一方面，赋予君主绝对权力意味着人们必须服从统治者的意愿和要求，而不是按照自己的需要和欲望行事，违背这些要求就会导致惩罚。为什么有人要限制人权?为什么有人要别人强迫他做一些违背自己观点和信仰的事情?这不是完全没有规则的情况，而是规则应该由人民和为人民制定。如果人们做了违背自己意愿的事情，他们就不应该感到受压迫，如果他们不满足这些要求，他们就会害怕受到惩罚。这违反了普遍接受的民主概念，即个人可以自由地表达自己的意愿和发表声明。
新西兰代写论文:洛克与霍布斯的观点
Locke holds different position compared to Hobbes. He believes that people could live in a state of nature, and life would be possible even without the legally established government. The state of nature for him is “pre – political, but not pre – moral”. [30] Furthermore, this state of nature for him is a state of complete freedom where all people are equal and only “bond by the law of nature”. [31] He worries that an absolute sovereign, with absolute power, would be even more of a danger to us than life in the state of nature. This is positive in Locke’s thought because is better to live in a state of nature where you live in complete freedom without limitations of the personal rights and liberties. On the other hand, giving the absolute power to a sovereign means that people have to obey the wishes and the demands of the ruler, rather than following their own needs and desires, and disobeying those demands leads to penalization. Why would someone want to have limited human rights? Why would someone want someone else to pressure him in doing something that is against his opinion and his beliefs? It is not the case of not having rules at all but rather that the rules should be made from the people and for the people. The people should not feel oppressed if they do something that is against one’s will and feel scared of punishment if they do not meet those requirements. This is against the commonly accepted notion of democracy in which the individual is free in expressing his own will and making statements.