ASSIGNMENT代写

新西兰代写留学生作业:道德的观点

2018-12-30 18:12

综上所述,我认为苏格拉底应该越狱,因为忠实原则假定法律永远是公正的。然而,从道德的观点来看,我们可能会认为苏格拉底不应该基于这一论点而越狱,因为他必须表明信守诺言的重要性,而不是通过不逃跑,他忽视了法律。例如,制定法律是为了维持一个涉及惩罚的有秩序的社会,从而造成对与错的二分法。只考虑“保持的承诺”的想法在他的论点,苏格拉底被非法判刑的人开辟了道路,忽视整个法律系统创建为了区分对与错,只是作为国家说由于“天然”绑定之间和国家的人。他忽视了国家的操纵和人的生活欲望。苏格拉底认为孝道原则是一个重要的论点。然而,这个论点是建立在一个无法自我维持的类比上的,因为苏格拉底将他与国家的关系比作父子关系,却没有质疑国家看待与公民关系的方式。最后,德沃金的不道德权利与合法权利的对比,以及他对权利何时可以被限制的限制,强调了一些行为虽然可能是不道德的,但并不是非法的(德沃金35),因此苏格拉底应该逃离监狱。
新西兰代写留学生作业:道德的观点
To conclude, I believe that Socrates should escape from prison because the Principle of Fidelity assumes that a law is always just. While on a moralistic view we may argue that Socrates should not escape from prison based on this argument because he has to show the importance of maintaining his promise, instead by not escaping he ignores the law. For example, laws are created to maintain an orderly society in which punishments are involved, creating a dichotomy between right versus wrong. By only considering the idea of ‘keeping ones promise’ in his argument, Socrates opens the way for people who have been illegally convicted to ignore the entire law system which is created in order to distinguish between right and wrong, and simply do as the state says to due to a ‘natural’ binding between the person and the state. He ignores the manipulations of the state and one’s desires to live. Also, Socrates argues for the Principle of Filial Piety as an important argument. However, the argument is created on an analogy which cannot sustain itself because Socrates compares his relationship to the state as a parent child relationship, but fails to question the way the state sees the relationship with its citizens. Lastly, Dworkin’s idea of immoral rights versus legal rights and his limitations of when rights can be restricted highlights how although some actions may be immoral, they are not illegal (Dworkin 35), therefore Socrates should escape from jail.