ASSIGNMENT代写

新西兰代写作业:难民的法定定义

2019-02-08 14:19

在对难民的法定定义下了宽泛的定义之后,下一个应该考虑的问题是,为什么这样的人会希望来到英国?正如我们将讨论的那样,英国在向难民提供庇护方面并不总是有着如此自豪的历史。然而,这并没有减损这样一个事实,即在第二次世界大战后的年代,甚至在二战前的年代,英国一直被视为难民非常欢迎和有吸引力的前景。与某些西方国家相比,无论是在欧洲内部,还是在更广泛的经济发达的“西方”(澳大利亚是最明显的例子),英国的政策(和政策应该区别于实际的做法和结果)都相对宽松。将审查这些政策的确切性质。除了这些,联合王国对难民的吸引力在于,这些岛屿提供政治和宗教自由。英格兰国教会是建制派的一部分,这在一个日益世俗化的国家中越来越不重要,不管怎样也不重要,因为宗教宽容是至高无上的。在英国境内,难民不会像在其他地方那样受到有系统的、政府支持的迫害。然而,显而易见的是,这当然不意味着在英国境内获得庇护的难民就能免受来自基层民众的这种迫害。因此,考虑到英国作为难民避难所的历史,有一个重要的区别需要记住。这种区别是官方对移民和庇护的态度(当然,最明显的是在立法中)和人民的态度之间的区别,后者往往被偏见和狭隘的思想所划分,表现在对这些难民的攻击和有效的迫害。
新西兰代写作业:难民的法定定义
Having defined broadly what the statutory definition of a refugee is, the next question which ought to be considered is why such a person would wish to come to the UK? As shall be discussed, the UK has not always had such a proud history of offering sanctuary to refugees. This does not, however, detract from the fact that in the post-Second World War years, but even in eras prior to that, the UK has been seen as a very welcoming and attractive prospect for refugees. Compared to certain Western countries, both within Europe and also in the wider economically developed ‘West’ (Australia providing the most stark example), Britain’s policies (and policies should be distinguished from actual practice and results here) have been relatively relaxed. The exact nature of these policies will be examined. Aside from these, the attractions of the United Kingdom to refugees are that the Isles offer political and religious freedom and liberty. The fact that the Church of England is part of the Establishment, this is less and less important in an increasingly secularised state, and anyway unimportant because of the primacy accorded to religious tolerance. Within the UK, refugees will suffer no systematic and State-sponsored persecution as they might elsewhere. As will become apparent, however, this certainly does not mean that refugees granted sanctuary within the UK are guaranteed freedom from such persecution at the hands of the grass-roots population.There is, then, an important distinction to be remembered when considering the history of Britain as a provider of sanctuary to refugees. This distinction is between the official State attitude to immigration and sanctuary, most recognisably apparent, of course, in legislation, and the attitudes of the population, all-too-often categorised by prejudices and narrow-mindedness, and manifested in attacks and effectively persecution of such refugees.