ASSIGNMENT代写

美国代写Essay BPL实验说明

2016-12-17 10:45

使用控制,实验室实验,证明因果关系,本文探讨了影响预测信息验证印象管理实践,在创建网上约会档案时,使用变异的原始虚假管道过程(BPL;琼斯& Sigall,1971),在其中一个实验小组被告知,他们的身高和体重测量和显示电子磅秤和传统高度卷尺,创建个人资料前,与对照组相比,谁没有收到底保。所使用的特定的底保了其他人已经,为了匹配实验中,他们使用的上下文(见,例如。Quigley-Fernandez &泰德斯,1978;萨比尼et al .,2001),这样操作有一定研究和(假设)导致身高和体重的一个显著差异报告。

提出的假说1(H1),一个显著的影响存在BPL时获得统计学比较报告身体质量指数(BMI指数;请参阅附录D指数公式)——形式的身高体重比例的底保实验组non-BPL对照组。比控制条件下,参与者的底保条件明显高于BMI。换句话说,参与者认为他们的信息核实,一旦他们完成了网上问卷,报道什么可以认为是更真实和更少的社会理想的信息,考虑到当前的社会环境,在美国,其中低bmi指数通常认为表明更大的外貌

(Kronenfeld et al .,2010)。论文中找到支持的差异解释,预测的虚拟交友档案将会比一个人的真实的自我,在未来的时间,可能会导致潜在的约会者预期期望失验的可能性(Burgoon &普罗瓦德,1993)。在这种情况下,报告真实信息——至少在身高和体重方面可能不会产生过度的期望,从而降低潜在的约会对象的不满的可能性。因此,H1的基础似乎已经收到由研究结果的支持。

美国代写Essay BPL实验说明

Using a controlled, laboratory experiment, to demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship, this thesis examines the effects of anticipating information verification on impression management practices, when creating online dating profiles, using a variation of the original Bogus Pipeline procedure (BPL; Jones & Sigall, 1971), wherein an experimental group was told that their height and weight would be measured and were shown an electronic weighing scale and traditional height measuring tape, prior to creating their profiles – as compared to a control group who did not receive the BPL. The particular BPL used herein was developed much as others have been, in order to match the context of the experiments in which they were used (see, e.g., Quigley-Fernandez & Tedeschi, 1978; Sabini et al., 2001), so that the manipulation would make sense in the study and (hypothetically) lead to a significant difference in height and weight reporting.  
As proposed by Hypothesis 1 (H1), a significant effect for the presence of BPL was obtained when statistically comparing reported Body Mass Indices (BMIs; see Appendix D for the BMI Formula) – which are forms of height to weight ratios – of the BPL experimental group to the non-BPL control group.  As compared to the control condition, participants in the BPL condition reported a significantly higher BMI.  In other words, participants who believed that their information would be verified, once they completed the online questionnaire, reported what can be assumed to be more veridical and less socially desirable information, given the current social context, in the U.S., wherein lower BMIs are generally thought to indicate greater physical attractiveness
(Kronenfeld et al., 2010).  The difference found in the thesis supports the given explanation that anticipating that one’s virtual dating profile will be compared to one’s true self, at a future time, can cause potential daters to anticipate the possibility of expectancy disconfirmation (Burgoon & Poire, 1993).  In this case, reporting veridical information – at least in terms of height and weight – may not create undue expectations, and thereby lower the likelihood of dissatisfaction of potential dates.  As such, the bases of H1 seem to have received the support represented by the findings.