ASSIGNMENT代写

惠灵顿代写Assignment:司法能力体现

2017-03-26 15:24

的确,当我们看的司法能力体现在2003年的刑事司法法案,而且,当我们了解的程度国家主持科恩的净扩大和网格稀疏的犯罪学的理论我们可以开始了解有这样一个巨大的认罪减少量刑结果的传递这条立法。当我们详细看,例如,司法权力的扩展关于禁毒政策,我们可以看到国家不得不采取更宽容的方式判决,以避免流行病的逮捕行动,以应对“大幅增加惩罚”(Newburn 2007:475)面对用户和供应商的C类药物。句子而不是那些贩卖毒品罪认罪,国家被迫看选择开始与一般社会秩序为所有犯罪者十六岁以上的由“需求符合犯罪的严重性”(点,2005:212)。因此,而不是期待传授监禁在应对各种各样的药物信念,刑事司法行为的规定看向更自由反应药物的问题在当代社会调用等措施强制药检和国家资助的范围内提供药物咨询——社区(而不是监狱)。虽然这很明显可以看到跟随占主导地位的社会政治意识形态,力求避免(在可能的情况下)捕捉罪犯在刑罚制度,还有一个不可阻挡的悖论的反毒品政策封装在2003年的刑事审判法,自由响应(例如发行冲销平板电脑犯人注射)抵消了传统惩罚措施(如药物测试小罪犯在社区的顺序)这似乎矛盾减少犯罪的更广泛的目标数据在英格兰和威尔士。从这个角度来说,我们可以开始了解2003年的刑事审判法作为一个真正的证据转向一个更可自由应对犯罪相关问题,在当代社会秩序和无法无天的同时被嵌入到更传统的惩罚性措施,仍然认为罪犯是一种异常现象和犯罪作为一个异常纠正偏差符合惩罚和控制。
惠灵顿代写Assignment:司法能力体现
Indeed, when we look at the creeping judicial competences enshrined within the Criminal Justice Act of 2003 and, moreover, when we understand the extent to which the state has presided over Cohen’s ‘net widening’ and ‘mesh thinning’ criminological theory we can begin to understand how there has been such a vast reduction in sentencing for guilty pleas as a result of the passing of this piece of legislation. When we look in detail at, for example, the extension of judicial powers with regards to anti-drug policy, we can see how the state had to adopt a more lenient approach to sentencing to avoid an epidemic of arrests in response to the “substantially increased penalties” (Newburn, 2007:475) facing users and suppliers of class C drugs. Rather than sentence those who plead guilty to drug offences, the state has been forced to look at alternatives beginning with the generic Community Order for all offenders over the age of sixteen which comprises “requirements commensurate with the seriousness of the offence” (Wincup, 2005:212). Thus, rather than looking towards handing down a custodial sentence in response to a variety of drug convictions, the stipulations of the Criminal Justice Act look towards more liberal responses to the problem of drugs in contemporary society invoking such measures as mandatory drug testing and state sponsored drug counselling – both provided within the confines of the community (as opposed to prison). While this can clearly be seen to follow the dominant socio-political ideology which strives to avoid (where possible) snaring offenders within the penal system, there is also an inexorable paradox to the anti drug policy encapsulated in the 2003 Criminal Justice Act whereby liberal responses (for instance issuing sterilising tablets to prisoners who inject) are offset by traditional punitive measures (such as drug testing minor offenders within the confines of the Community Order) which appear to contradict the broader aiming of reducing crime figures in England and Wales. Viewed through this prism, we can begin to understand the 2003 Criminal Justice Act as evidence of a genuine shift towards a more discernibly liberal response to issues relating to crime, order and lawlessness in contemporary society while at the same time being embedded to more traditional punitive measures which still interpret criminals as an aberration and crime as an anomaly with both deviations best served by corrective punishment and control.